Preservation and Stewardship Committee Telecon 2013-05-13
-
Subgroup Reports
-
PCCS discussion - LIS article planning
-
Data Collection Structure Discussion
-
Identifiers discussion
-
PCCS Opinion article describing motivation
-
DDS activities
-
-
Continue planning more focused discussions on this list: spreadsheet
-
Update planning activities document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lPFHUXmAXA4eOtRAD4-aUqVgPA0EOvkhbvFjwMMdVY4/edit?pli=1
-
PCCS discussion
-
submit an article to http://dlib.org
-
Need to schedule a followup telecon
-
Notes from telecon - http://goo.gl/1elVU
-
Originally set deadline of May 15 - but discussion is about pushing date back to 6/1, with draft to review on telecon June 24.
-
Data Quality Discussion
-
Cancel May 20 telecon
-
Discussion of what’s next during summer meeting - find someone to be a champion
-
If there’s no champion, drop for now
-
Bruce B. - comments about RDA efforts focusing on biomedical, would be good to have more ES and large datasets, etc; NSF has a call out about this
-
Mark P - peer review models around data publication. ESIP doesn’t necessarily need to jump in, but we should interface with others if we do.
-
Bruce B - some push for IT solutions from particular disciplines, makes for difficulty on promoting standards
-
Data Collection Structure
-
Notes from telecon: http://goo.gl/IAL5D
-
Presentations from Ruth, Denise, Curt, Bruce (links to presentations, where available, within the notes)
-
Next telecon on June 17, with some action items from specific people
-
Mark - has question about what the ultimate goal of this effort?
-
Bruce - helps with standards organization, repackagings, etc
-
Mark - seems like there’s a diverse range here - questions of reference vs. equivalence; or querying. What’s the end game? Recs for references, for querying (semantic approach), for discovery?
-
Rama - querying might fall more under Discovery cluster rather that Stewardship
-
Bruce - how people find the data is important to understand what sort of stewardship might be necessary
-
Identifiers discussion
-
Notes: ??
-
Only Curt, Ruth, Steve O., and Tyler called in
-
Group not large enough to pursue next steps
-
RDA has group on PIDs - if not enough interest here, may just refer to RDA group
-
Anne W. - still interested, is there a list of what we were interested in?
-
Yes, in the Data Stewardship Activity Planning document http://goo.gl/55eTO
-
-
Bob D also still interested but was unable to attend telecon
-
Mark P - RDA group is called Persistent Identifier Types. Several things in RDA go along with ESIP activities
-
Ruth came up with idea of LIAISONS between ESIP Data Stewardship community to relevant RDA groups
-
People are making standards, etc., with focus on their own group without seeing what is beyond their own domain
-
The cleverness of ESIP needs to get pushed into the wider world, a broader global context, both within and beyond Earth Science
-
Link to RDA PID forum: http://forum.rd-alliance.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=25
-
-
Rama - what would be useful would be if PCCS were reexamined, an exercise on what needs identifiers
-
Ruth - very important to move forward
-
Anne - potential volunteer. Anne and Mark will discuss
-
Please comment on RDA citation case statement http://forum.rd-alliance.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=87
-
PCCS Opinion article describing motivation
-
Notes from telecon: http://goo.gl/4OIvv
-
Working Draft: http://goo.gl/w797O
-
Will have next telecon last week of May/first week of June (doodle poll is at http://www.doodle.com/i3ic85y6u5psmts2 )
-
Discussed options of where to send article (tentatively set to Science)
-
Brief article on what it is, why it’s important, and who’s responsible for what part
-
DDS activities
-
Telecon notes/materials: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Telecon_04.25.13_materials
-
Working on Panel Discussion for summer meeting
-
Draft of abstract
-
Draft list of potential invitees
-
Anne will send out a list to “vote” on potential invitees, compile results, and then invite people in order
(Denise here - got booted from the webex right near the end, so missed a bit)
Continue the discussion! We’re over time - and didn’t even get to past agenda item 1. Defer remaining items until next time.